This is a work in progress:
Sectors are considered to add value to each other. However, sectors combine in nonlinear manner. That is they do not just add value between
each other, they also multiply between each other, and with themselves.
Consider transportation.
Transporting an object across country does not add value to that object. It
multiplies that object’s value, say by a
factor of, for example, 1.3. This would ‘add’
30% to the value of the object, but the real process is not addition. If the
process were addition, then driving
an empty truck across country would add
value to nothing. (Unless the truck were more valuable on one side of the
country than the other. Then the truck’s
value would be multiplied.) But this is
absurd. On the other hand, multiplying with nothing still gives you
nothing.
Manufacturing a good is multiplicative. Each step in the
manufacturing process multiplies the value of factors, and the value of the
final product is the ‘product’ of these steps.
Profit is multiplicative.
Where nothing is produced, no profit can be made. A product or service is sold at a multiple of
its value: Greater than one for a
profit, less than one for a loss.
Government, then, which is basically in the business of
redistributing, transferring, demand, is multiplicative. It is in the business of rearranging factors,
seeking to maximize the total produced by the economy. However, it can really only tax agriculture
and other extractive sectors, mineral mining and energy extraction. This implies
that the product of the tax (a factor less than one), and the subsidy (greater
than one), is always less than one, because of the cost. That is the cost is always greater than the
benefit. But where the government transfers demand from non-productive sectors
to productive sectors, that is, where the subsidy is fictitious, an economy can
experience real benefit.
There are cross terms
And powers of terms. The church (charity) is another. It transfers demand
down the social scale, thus expanding the
base of consumption and giving more members of society a stake in that society.
Libertarian states minimize the government source of
cross terms, and thus cannot compete against larger effective governments which
increase cross terms, and thus greatly magnify the economy.
Found it!
ReplyDelete"Profit is multiplicative," you said. Adam Smith agrees. He says the increase of wages is arithmetic and the increase of profit is geometric. He says:
"In raising the price of commodities the rise of wages operates in the same manner as simple interest does in the accumulation of debt. The rise of profit operates like compound interest."
From: The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 9: The Profits of Stock
I have a longer excerpt here:
http://newarthurianeconomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/wage-push-inflation-my-ass.html